In Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i7-4790T and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $126 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – 251 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Up to 84% cheaper – $23.99 vs $149.88
- Up to 84% cheaper
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 – $0.09 vs $0.60/FPS
- Up to 85% better value in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-4790T
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
251 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
188 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
247 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
185 FPS
98%
Price, $
$149.88
16%
Value, $/FPS
$0.6/FPS
15%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4790T
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.7 GHz
93%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4790T May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
