In Atomfall, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i7-4790. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $76 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 76% cheaper – $23.99 vs $99.99
- Up to 76% cheaper
- Up to 75% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $0.48/FPS
- Up to 75% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Core i7-4790
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall – 206 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Atomfall
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer – May 01, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 months and 28 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
96%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
96%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Average FPS
206 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
154 FPS
100%
Price, $
$99.99
23%
Value, $/FPS
$0.48/FPS
25%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-4790 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-4790
May 1st, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-4790 May 1st, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | May 1st, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $312.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
