In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i7-3770. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $150 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Apr 29, 2012
- Is 1 year and 4 months newer
- Up to 86% cheaper – $23.99 vs $173.83
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.13 vs $0.92/FPS
- Up to 86% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 55% less energy – 35 vs 77 Watts
- Consumes up to 55% less energy
Core i7-3770
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 188 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-3770: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
184 FPS
98%
Min 1% FPS
138 FPS
98%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Average FPS
188 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
141 FPS
100%
Price, $
$173.83
13%
Value, $/FPS
$0.92/FPS
14%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-3770 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-3770 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-3770
Apr 29th, 2012
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-3770 Apr 29th, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 29th, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $278.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1155 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 77 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4000 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
