In Atomfall, the Core i3-4130T is slower than the Core i7-13700K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $486 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 95% cheaper – $23.99 vs $509.86
- Up to 95% cheaper
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall – $0.12 vs $2.08/FPS
- Up to 94% better value in Atomfall
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i7-13700K
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall – 244 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 24% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 25 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-13700K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
81%
Min 1% FPS
147 FPS
80%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
244 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
183 FPS
100%
Price, $
$509.86
4%
Value, $/FPS
$2.08/FPS
6%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-13700K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i7-13700K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-13700K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-13700K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $409.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
