In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $39 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Up to 62% cheaper – $23.99 vs $63.33
- Up to 62% cheaper
- Up to 61% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.12 vs $0.31/FPS
- Up to 61% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 52% less energy – 35 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 52% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 201 vs 185 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
185 FPS
92%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
93%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
201 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
150 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
39%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1156 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
