In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130T is same performance as the Core i5-4460. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $40 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 63% cheaper – $23.99 vs $64.04
- Up to 63% cheaper
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop – $0.10 vs $0.29/FPS
- Up to 66% better value in Deathloop
- Consumes up to 58% less energy – 35 vs 84 Watts
- Consumes up to 58% less energy
Core i5-4460
- Is 8 months and 8 days newer – May 11, 2014 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 8 months and 8 days newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-4460: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
219 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
164 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Average FPS
218 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
99%
Price, $
$64.04
37%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
34%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-4460 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-4460 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-4460
May 11th, 2014
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-4460 May 11th, 2014 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | May 11th, 2014 |
| – | MSRP | $187.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1150 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 84 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1600 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD 4600 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
