In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i5-10400 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $151 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 186 vs 174 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 86% cheaper – $23.99 vs $174.99
- Up to 86% cheaper
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.12 vs $1.00/FPS
- Up to 88% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i5-10400
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
186 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
139 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
174 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
130 FPS
94%
Price, $
$174.99
13%
Value, $/FPS
$1/FPS
12%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
