In Atomfall, the Core i3-4130T is slightly slower than the Core i3-9350KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4130T
- Consumes up to 62% less energy – 35 vs 91 Watts
- Consumes up to 62% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-9350KF
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall – 212 vs 197 FPS
- Up to 8% faster in Atomfall
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer – Jan 08, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 4 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-9350KF: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
197 FPS
93%
Min 1% FPS
148 FPS
93%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-9350KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-9350KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-9350KF
Jan 8th, 2019
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-9350KF Jan 8th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $173.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 91 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
