In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4130T is slightly faster than the Core i3-10105 and it's also a much better value for money, as it's $111 cheaper!
Core i3-4130T
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 187 vs 175 FPS
- Up to 7% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Up to 82% cheaper – $23.99 vs $135.04
- Up to 82% cheaper
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part II – $0.12 vs $0.77/FPS
- Up to 84% better value in The Last of Us Part II
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core i3-10105
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-10105: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
187 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
100%
Price, $
$23.99
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.12/FPS
100%
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
175 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
131 FPS
94%
Price, $
$135.04
17%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
16%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-10105 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130T vs Core i3-10105 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130T
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
78%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-10105
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130T Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-10105 Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $122.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
