In Atomfall, the Core i3-4130 is slightly faster than the FX-6300. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4130
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall – 199 vs 187 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Atomfall
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Oct 23, 2012
- Is 10 months and 8 days newer
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
FX-6300
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs FX-6300: Comparison of performance and price
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Average FPS
187 FPS
94%
Min 1% FPS
140 FPS
94%
Price, $
$40.65
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs FX-6300 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs FX-6300 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
97%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-6300
Oct 23rd, 2012
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-6300 Oct 23rd, 2012 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| – | MSRP | $132.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 95W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
