In Deathloop, the Core i3-4130 is slightly slower than the FX-4350. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4130
- Is 4 months and 3 days newer – Sep 01, 2013 vs Apr 29, 2013
- Is 4 months and 3 days newer
- Consumes up to 57% less energy – 54 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 57% less energy
FX-4350
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop – 222 vs 218 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Deathloop
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs FX-4350: Comparison of performance and price
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Average FPS
222 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
166 FPS
100%
Price, $
$82.71
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.37/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs FX-4350 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs FX-4350 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
81%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
FX-4350
Apr 29th, 2013
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1866 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | FX-4350 Apr 29th, 2013 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | AM3+ |
54W | Power Consumption | 125W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1866 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
