In Rust, the Core i3-4130 is slightly slower than the Core i9-9900K. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $309 cheaper!
Core i3-4130
- Up to 88% cheaper – $41.00 vs $350.00
- Up to 88% cheaper
- Up to 87% better value in Rust – $0.19 vs $1.48/FPS
- Up to 87% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 54 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
Core i9-9900K
- Up to 9% faster in Rust – 235 vs 215 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Rust
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer – Oct 19, 2018 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 1 month newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-9900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
215 FPS
91%
Min 1% FPS
47 FPS
77%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.19/FPS
100%
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Average FPS
235 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
61 FPS
100%
Price, $
$350
11%
Value, $/FPS
$1.48/FPS
13%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-9900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-9900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-9900K
Oct 19th, 2018
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-9900K Oct 19th, 2018 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Oct 19th, 2018 |
| – | MSRP | $488.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
