In Rust, the Core i3-4130 is slower than the Core i9-13900F. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $489 cheaper!
Core i3-4130
- Up to 92% cheaper – $41.00 vs $529.91
- Up to 92% cheaper
- Up to 91% better value in Rust – $0.18 vs $1.93/FPS
- Up to 91% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900F
- Up to 26% faster in Rust – 274 vs 217 FPS
- Up to 26% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer – Jan 04, 2023 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 9 years and 4 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-13900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
217 FPS
79%
Min 1% FPS
48 FPS
55%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.18/FPS
100%
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
274 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
87 FPS
100%
Price, $
$529.91
7%
Value, $/FPS
$1.93/FPS
9%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-13900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i9-13900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900F
Jan 4th, 2023
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900F Jan 4th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $524.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1700 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
