In Battlefield 1, the Core i3-4130 is slightly slower than the Core i7-9700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4130
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-9700F
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 1 – 254 vs 245 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Battlefield 1
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer – Apr 23, 2019 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 5 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 1 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs Core i7-9700F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.09/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i7-9700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i7-9700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-9700F
Apr 23rd, 2019
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
88%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-9700F Apr 23rd, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $333.00 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
54W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
