In Counter-Strike 2, the Core i3-4130 is slightly slower than the Core i5-7400T. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $37 cheaper!
Core i3-4130
- Up to 47% cheaper – $41.00 vs $78.02
- Up to 47% cheaper
- Up to 48% better value in Counter-Strike 2 – $0.14 vs $0.27/FPS
- Up to 48% better value in Counter-Strike 2
Core i5-7400T
- Up to 1% faster in Counter-Strike 2 – 281 vs 278 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Counter-Strike 2
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 3 years and 4 months newer
- Consumes up to 35% less energy – 35 vs 54 Watts
- Consumes up to 35% less energy
Counter-Strike 2 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7400T: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
278 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
177 FPS
99%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.14/FPS
100%
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
281 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
179 FPS
100%
Price, $
$78.02
52%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
52%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-7400T Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1151 |
| 54 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | HD 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
