Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400F outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4130 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4130 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-13400F is 3412 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4130.
Advantages of Core i3-4130
- Up to 95% cheaper than Core i5-13400F - $41.00 vs $899.99
- Up to 95% better value when playing Dead Space than Core i5-13400F - $0.28 vs $5.62 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i5-13400F
- Performs up to 8% better in Dead Space than Core i3-4130 - 160 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130 - 16 vs 4 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 238 minutes ago
Buy for $899.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 236 minutes ago
Trending Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4130 | vs | Core i5-13400F |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 10 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
54 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |