In Control, the Core i3-4130 is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $106 cheaper!
Core i3-4130
- Up to 72% cheaper – $41.00 vs $147.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 73% better value in Control – $0.16 vs $0.59/FPS
- Up to 73% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 17% less energy – 54 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 17% less energy
Core i5-10400
- Up to 1% faster in Control – 249 vs 247 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Control
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Sep 01, 2013
- Is 6 years and 7 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-10400: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Average FPS
247 FPS
99%
Min 1% FPS
162 FPS
99%
Price, $
$41
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.16/FPS
100%
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
249 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
163 FPS
100%
Price, $
$147
27%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
27%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-10400 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4130 vs Core i5-10400 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4130
Sep 1st, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
85%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4130 Sep 1st, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400 Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGA1150 | Socket | LGA1200 |
54 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
