In Atomfall, the Core i3-4010U is slightly faster than the Xeon X3430. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4010U
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall – 189 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 2% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer – Jun 04, 2013 vs Sep 08, 2009
- Is 3 years and 8 months newer
- Consumes up to 84% less energy – 15 vs 95 Watts
- Consumes up to 84% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon X3430
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4010U vs Xeon X3430: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Xeon X3430 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Xeon X3430 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon X3430
Sep 8th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4010U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon X3430 Sep 8th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Sep 8th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $189.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1156 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 95 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
