The Core i3-4010U is a much slower gaming CPU than the Xeon E5-2699A v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 15 vs 145 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Xeon E5-2699A v4
- A much faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 44 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4010U vs Xeon E5-2699A v4
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
97%
Min 1% FPS
126
98%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
188
100%
Min 1% FPS
129
100%
Price, $
$1595.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$8.48/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Xeon E5-2699A v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
9%
L3 Cache
3 MB
5%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-2699A v4
Oct 25th, 2016
Cores
22-core
100%
L3 Cache
55 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Xeon E5-2699A v4 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $4,938.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Broadwell-EP |
15 W | Power Consumption | 145 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 22 |
| 4 | Threads | 44 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.6 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 55 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
