The Core i3-4010U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the EPYC 7302. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 90% less energy – 15 vs 155 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the EPYC 7302
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 32 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4010U vs EPYC 7302
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
93%
Min 1% FPS
126
93%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Average FPS
196
100%
Min 1% FPS
135
100%
Price, $
$839.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.28/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs EPYC 7302 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs EPYC 7302 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
2%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
EPYC 7302
Aug 7th, 2019
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
128 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EPYC 7302 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Aug 7th, 2019 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Rome |
15 W | Power Consumption | 155 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 16 |
| 4 | Threads | 32 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.3 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 128 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | No |
