In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-4010U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-13900K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 15 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 88% less energy
Core i9-13900K
- Up to 40% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 132 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 40% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
132 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
99 FPS
100%
Price, $
$548.89
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.15/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-13900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
57%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900K
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4010U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900K Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $589.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
