In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-4010U is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 77% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6 – 116 vs 61 FPS
- Up to 90% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jun 04, 2013
- Is 8 years and 7 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4010U Jun 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $494.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | LGA1700 |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4400 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
