The Core i3-4010U is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i7-10700. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4010U
- Consumes up to 77% less energy – 15 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of the Core i7-10700
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 16 vs 4 threads
Core i3-4010U vs Core i7-10700
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Average FPS
183
88%
Min 1% FPS
126
89%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
207
100%
Min 1% FPS
142
100%
Price, $
$170
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.82/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i7-10700 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4010U vs Core i7-10700 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4010U
Jun 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
1.7 GHz
59%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-10700
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-4010U | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i7-10700 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
| Haswell | Codename | Comet Lake |
15 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 1.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.9 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 4.8 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 16 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| Intel HD 4400 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
