In Rust, the Core i3-4000M is slightly slower than the Xeon E5-1630 v4. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 74% less energy – 37 vs 140 Watts
- Consumes up to 74% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Up to 6% faster in Rust – 224 vs 212 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in Rust
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer – Jun 20, 2016 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 2 years and 9 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Xeon E5-1630 v4: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Average FPS
224 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
53 FPS
100%
Price, $
$298.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Xeon E5-1630 v4 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
30%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5-1630 v4
Jun 20th, 2016
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
10 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5-1630 v4 Jun 20th, 2016 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Jun 20th, 2016 |
| – | MSRP | $406.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA2011-3 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 140 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
