Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX is 2505 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 87% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX - 37 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX
- Performs up to 11% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-4000M - 192 vs 173 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 32 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
192
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.82/FPS
100%
Price, $
$925
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $925 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 185 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4000M | vs | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3955WX |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Haswell | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
37 W | TDP | 280 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |