In Control, the Core i3-4000M is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 43% less energy – 37 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 43% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core Ultra 7 265F
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 254 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer – Jan 07, 2025 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 11 years and 4 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core Ultra 7 265F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Average FPS
254 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
167 FPS
100%
Price, $
$288
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.13/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core Ultra 7 265F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core Ultra 7 265F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265F
Jan 7th, 2025
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265F Jan 7th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $379.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1851 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
