Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900KF outperforms Core i3-4000M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900KF is 3695 days newer than Core i3-4000M.
Advantages of Core i3-4000M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Core i9-14900KF
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-4000M - 139 vs 94 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4000M - 32 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
139
100%
Value, $/FPS
$3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$417.61
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $417.61 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 179 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 4th, 2013
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-4000M | vs | Core i9-14900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 24 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 6.0 GHz |
37 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |