In Atomfall, the Core i3-4000M is slower than the Core i9-13900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-13900KF
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall – 246 vs 192 FPS
- Up to 28% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 22 days newer – Sep 27, 2022 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 9 years and 22 days newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-13900KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Average FPS
246 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
$549
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.23/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-13900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-13900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-13900KF
Sep 27th, 2022
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-13900KF Sep 27th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Sep 27th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
