Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-12900KF in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-4000M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-12900KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU as it has integrated graphics
Advantages of the Core i9-12900KF
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 24 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Average FPS
186
81%
Min 1% FPS
129
82%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
231
100%
Min 1% FPS
157
100%
Price, $
$242
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-12900KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i9-12900KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900KF |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $564.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 3200 MHz, DDR5 @ 4800 MHz |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | No |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
