In Atomfall, the Core i3-4000M is slightly faster than the Core i7-820QM. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall – 194 vs 186 FPS
- Up to 4% faster in Atomfall
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer – Sep 04, 2013 vs Sep 23, 2009
- Is 3 years and 11 months newer
- Consumes up to 18% less energy – 37 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 18% less energy
Core i7-820QM
No clear advantages
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core i7-820QM: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i7-820QM in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i7-820QM in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-820QM
Sep 23rd, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
1.733 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
3.067 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-820QM Sep 23rd, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Sep 23rd, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $546.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGAG1 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 45 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | None |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
