In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-4000M is slightly slower than the Core i5-650. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer – Sep 04, 2013 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 3 years and 7 months newer
- Consumes up to 49% less energy – 37 vs 73 Watts
- Consumes up to 49% less energy
Core i5-650
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 204 vs 193 FPS
- Up to 6% faster in The Last of Us Part II
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-650: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
204 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
153 FPS
100%
Price, $
$63.33
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-650 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-650 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
3 MB
75%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-650
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
100%
L3 Cache
4 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.466 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1333 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-650 Jan 7th, 2010 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Jan 7th, 2010 |
| – | MSRP | $176.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1156 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 73 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1333 MHz (DDR3) |
| Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | Intel HD |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
