In Control, the Core i3-4000M is slightly slower than the Core i5-12600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-12600KF
- Up to 3% faster in Control – 253 vs 246 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Control
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 8 years and 2 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-12600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-12600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-12600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-12600KF
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-12600KF Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $264.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1700 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
