In Deathloop, the Core i3-4000M is slightly slower than the Core i5-11600KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-4000M
- Consumes up to 70% less energy – 37 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 70% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-11600KF
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop – 227 vs 220 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in Deathloop
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer – Mar 16, 2021 vs Sep 04, 2013
- Is 7 years and 6 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-11600KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Average FPS
227 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
170 FPS
100%
Price, $
$167
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.73/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-11600KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-4000M vs Core i5-11600KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-4000M
Sep 4th, 2013
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-11600KF
Mar 16th, 2021
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.9 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
3200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-4000M Sep 4th, 2013 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-11600KF Mar 16th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Sep 4th, 2013 | Released | Mar 16th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $237.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG3 | Socket | LGA1200 |
37 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4) |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
