The Core i3-390M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i5-7400T. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-390M
The Core i5-7400T is better in every way
Advantages of the Core i5-7400T
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
Core i3-390M vs Core i5-7400T for Gaming
The CPU's performance in selected game and settings
Core i3-390M
Jan 9th, 2011
Average FPS
165
93%
Min 1% FPS
111
93%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Average FPS
178
100%
Min 1% FPS
119
100%
Price, $
$64.56
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Core i3-390M vs Core i5-7400T in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-390M vs Core i5-7400T in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-390M vs Core i5-7400T in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-390M
Jan 9th, 2011
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.67 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-7400T
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Core i3-390M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Core i5-7400T |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 9th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
| Arrandale | Codename | Kaby Lake |
| 35 W | Power Consumption | 35 W |
| Performance | ||
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
2.7 GHz | Base Frequency | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Frequency | 3.0 GHz |
| 3 MB | L3 Cache | 6 MB |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2400 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
