In The Last of Us Part II, the Core i3-380M is slightly faster than the Xeon E5530. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II – 205 vs 199 FPS
- Up to 3% faster in The Last of Us Part II
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer – Oct 26, 2010 vs Mar 30, 2009
- Is 1 year and 6 months newer
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 35 vs 80 Watts
- Consumes up to 56% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Xeon E5530
No clear advantages
The Last of Us Part II FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Xeon E5530: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Xeon E5530 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Xeon E5530 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
38%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Xeon E5530
Mar 30th, 2009
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
8 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
95%
Turbo Frequency
2.666 GHz
100%
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
1066 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Xeon E5530 Mar 30th, 2009 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Mar 30th, 2009 |
| – | MSRP | $530.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Server |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1366 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 80 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 1066 MHz (DDR3) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
