In Atomfall, the Core i3-380M is slower than the Ryzen 7 8700F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Ryzen 7 8700F
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall – 238 vs 184 FPS
- Up to 29% faster in Atomfall
- Is 13 years and 5 months newer – Apr 01, 2024 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 13 years and 5 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 7 8700F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Average FPS
238 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
178 FPS
100%
Price, $
$248.95
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.04/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 7 8700F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Ryzen 7 8700F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
19%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
62%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 8700F
Apr 1st, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
16 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.1 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5200 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 8700F Apr 1st, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 1st, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $270.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5200 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
