In Deathloop, the Core i3-380M is slightly slower than the Core Ultra 7 265K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core Ultra 7 265K
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop – 245 vs 224 FPS
- Up to 9% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer – Oct 24, 2024 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 13 years and 11 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Core Ultra 7 265K: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Average FPS
245 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
184 FPS
100%
Price, $
...
Value, $/FPS
...
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Core Ultra 7 265K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Core Ultra 7 265K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
65%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 7 265K
Oct 24th, 2024
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.5 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 7 265K Oct 24th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Oct 24th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $394.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
