In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-380M is slightly slower than the Core i7-7700HQ. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 22% less energy – 35 vs 45 Watts
- Consumes up to 22% less energy
Core i7-7700HQ
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6 – 69 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 11% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer – Jan 03, 2017 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 6 years and 2 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Core i7-7700HQ: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Core i7-7700HQ in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Core i7-7700HQ in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
50%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
90%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-7700HQ
Jan 3rd, 2017
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
6 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.8 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
3.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-7700HQ Jan 3rd, 2017 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
| – | MSRP | $378.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Laptop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | Intel BGA 1440 |
35W | Power Consumption | 45W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR3, 2400 MHz (DDR4) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Intel HD Graphics 630 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
