In Battlefield 6, the Core i3-380M is much slower than the Core i7-14700KF. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i7-14700KF
- Up to 110% faster in Battlefield 6 – 132 vs 63 FPS
- Up to 110% faster in Battlefield 6
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer – Oct 17, 2023 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 12 years and 11 months newer
Battlefield 6 FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Core i7-14700KF: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Core i7-14700KF in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Core i7-14700KF in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
10%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
75%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i7-14700KF
Oct 17th, 2023
Cores
20-core
100%
L3 Cache
33 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i7-14700KF Oct 17th, 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Oct 17th, 2023 |
| – | MSRP | $384.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
