In Deathloop, the Core i3-380M is slightly slower than the Core i3-14100. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 42% less energy – 35 vs 60 Watts
- Consumes up to 42% less energy
Core i3-14100
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop – 229 vs 226 FPS
- Up to 1% faster in Deathloop
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer – Jan 08, 2024 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 13 years and 2 months newer
Deathloop FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Core i3-14100: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Average FPS
229 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
172 FPS
100%
Price, $
$149.35
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Core i3-14100 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Core i3-14100 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
72%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-14100
Jan 8th, 2024
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-14100 Jan 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Jan 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $134.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 60 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 730 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
