In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-380M is slower than the Core i3-12100F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-380M
- Consumes up to 40% less energy – 35 vs 58 Watts
- Consumes up to 40% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i3-12100F
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 113 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 20% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer – Jan 14, 2022 vs Oct 26, 2010
- Is 11 years and 2 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-380M vs Core i3-12100F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-380M vs Core i3-12100F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-380M vs Core i3-12100F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-380M
Oct 26th, 2010
Cores
2-core
50%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.534 GHz
77%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i3-12100F
Jan 14th, 2022
Cores
4-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-380M Oct 26th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i3-12100F Jan 14th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Oct 26th, 2010 | Released | Jan 14th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $97.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 58 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
