In Rust, the Core i3-370M is slightly slower than the Core i9-10980XE. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy – 35 vs 165 Watts
- Consumes up to 79% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-10980XE
- Up to 14% faster in Rust – 237 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 14% faster in Rust
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer – Oct 19, 2019 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 9 years and 3 months newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-370M vs Core i9-10980XE: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Average FPS
237 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
62 FPS
100%
Price, $
$594.77
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.5/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-370M vs Core i9-10980XE in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-370M vs Core i9-10980XE in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
11%
L3 Cache
3 MB
12%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
80%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10980XE
Oct 19th, 2019
Cores
18-core
100%
L3 Cache
24.75 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.8 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10980XE Oct 19th, 2019 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Released | Oct 19th, 2019 |
| – | MSRP | $1,076.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA2066 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 165 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2933 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
