In Atomfall, the Core i3-370M is slightly slower than the Core i5-10400F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-370M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i5-10400F
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall – 211 vs 183 FPS
- Up to 15% faster in Atomfall
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer – Apr 30, 2020 vs Jun 20, 2010
- Is 9 years and 10 months newer
Atomfall FPS Calculator
Core i3-370M vs Core i5-10400F: Comparison of performance and price
All items are out of stock
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Average FPS
211 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
158 FPS
100%
Price, $
$165.17
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.78/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-370M vs Core i5-10400F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-370M vs Core i5-10400F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-370M
Jun 20th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
25%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
83%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i5-10400F
Apr 30th, 2020
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
12 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
4.3 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2666 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-370M Jun 20th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i5-10400F Apr 30th, 2020 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jun 20th, 2010 | Released | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| – | MSRP | – |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 2666 MHz (DDR4) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
