In Control, the Core i3-350M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 7 9800X3D. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $339 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 72% cheaper – $129.94 vs $469.00
- Up to 72% cheaper
- Up to 71% better value in Control – $0.53 vs $1.83/FPS
- Up to 71% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 35 vs 120 Watts
- Consumes up to 71% less energy
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
- Up to 5% faster in Control – 256 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Control
- Is 14 years and 10 months newer – Nov 07, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years and 10 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
244 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
95%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Nov 7th, 2024
Average FPS
256 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$469
27%
Value, $/FPS
$1.83/FPS
29%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 7 9800X3D in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
25%
L3 Cache
3 MB
3%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
48%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 7 9800X3D
Nov 7th, 2024
Cores
8-core
100%
L3 Cache
96 MB
100%
Base Frequency
4.7 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 7 9800X3D Nov 7th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Nov 7th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $479.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 120W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
