Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 8700G outperforms Core i3-350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 8700G is 5114 days newer than Core i3-350M.
Advantages of Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 8700G - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 7 8700G
- Performs up to 49% better in World of Warcraft than Core i3-350M - 224 vs 150 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-350M - 16 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-350M doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
224
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.14/FPS
100%
Price, $
$255
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $255 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6914 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Mobile • Jan 7th, 2010
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-350M | vs | Ryzen 7 8700G |
---|---|---|
Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 4 nm |
17.0x | Multiplier | 42.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon 780M |
No | Overclockable | Yes |