In Control, the Core i3-350M is slightly slower than the Ryzen 5 9600X. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $64 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 33% cheaper – $129.94 vs $194.00
- Up to 33% cheaper
- Up to 29% better value in Control – $0.53 vs $0.75/FPS
- Up to 29% better value in Control
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Ryzen 5 9600X
- Up to 5% faster in Control – 256 vs 244 FPS
- Up to 5% faster in Control
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer – Aug 08, 2024 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 14 years and 7 months newer
Control FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 9600X: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
244 FPS
95%
Min 1% FPS
160 FPS
95%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.53/FPS
100%
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Average FPS
256 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
168 FPS
100%
Price, $
$194
66%
Value, $/FPS
$0.75/FPS
71%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Ryzen 5 9600X in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
33%
L3 Cache
3 MB
9%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
58%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Ryzen 5 9600X
Aug 8th, 2024
Cores
6-core
100%
L3 Cache
32 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.9 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.4 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
5600 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Ryzen 5 9600X Aug 8th, 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Aug 8th, 2024 |
| – | MSRP | $279.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | AM5 |
35W | Power Consumption | 65W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 5600 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Radeon Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
