In Rust, the Core i3-350M is quite a bit slower than the Core Ultra 9 285. However, it's a much better value for money, as it's $433 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 77% cheaper – $129.94 vs $563.41
- Up to 77% cheaper
- Up to 69% better value in Rust – $0.62 vs $1.98/FPS
- Up to 69% better value in Rust
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
Core Ultra 9 285
- Up to 37% faster in Rust – 284 vs 208 FPS
- Up to 37% faster in Rust
- Is 15 years and 7 days newer – Jan 14, 2025 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 15 years and 7 days newer
Rust FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core Ultra 9 285: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
208 FPS
73%
Min 1% FPS
39 FPS
41%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.62/FPS
100%
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Average FPS
284 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
94 FPS
100%
Price, $
$563.41
23%
Value, $/FPS
$1.98/FPS
31%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core Ultra 9 285 in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
8%
L3 Cache
3 MB
8%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
91%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core Ultra 9 285
Jan 14th, 2025
Cores
24-core
100%
L3 Cache
36 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.5 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.6 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
6400 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core Ultra 9 285 Jan 14th, 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 14th, 2025 |
| – | MSRP | $579.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1851 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 6400 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | Arc Xe-LPG Graphics 64EU |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Not Overclockable |
