In The Callisto Protocol, the Core i3-350M is quite a bit slower than the Core i9-12900K. However, it's a better value for money, as it's $159 cheaper!
Core i3-350M
- Up to 55% cheaper – $129.94 vs $289.00
- Up to 55% cheaper
- Up to 30% better value in The Callisto Protocol – $1.26 vs $1.81/FPS
- Up to 30% better value in The Callisto Protocol
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
- Consumes up to 72% less energy
Core i9-12900K
- Up to 54% faster in The Callisto Protocol – 159 vs 103 FPS
- Up to 54% faster in The Callisto Protocol
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer – Nov 04, 2021 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 9 months newer
The Callisto Protocol FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900K: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
103 FPS
65%
Min 1% FPS
71 FPS
62%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.26/FPS
100%
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Average FPS
159 FPS
100%
Min 1% FPS
115 FPS
100%
Price, $
$289
44%
Value, $/FPS
$1.81/FPS
70%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
71%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900K
Nov 4th, 2021
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.2 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900K Nov 4th, 2021 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Nov 4th, 2021 |
| – | MSRP | $599.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | UHD Graphics 770 |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
