In Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020, the Core i3-350M is slower than the Core i9-12900F. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy – 35 vs 65 Watts
- Consumes up to 46% less energy
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
- Can run games without a dedicated GPU using its integrated graphics
Core i9-12900F
- Up to 31% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 – 123 vs 94 FPS
- Up to 31% faster in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer – Jan 04, 2022 vs Jan 07, 2010
- Is 11 years and 11 months newer
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 FPS Calculator
Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900F: Comparison of performance and price
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
94 FPS
76%
Min 1% FPS
66 FPS
72%
Price, $
$129.94
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.38/FPS
100%
All items are out of stock
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900F in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-12900F in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
12%
L3 Cache
3 MB
10%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
94%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-12900F
Jan 4th, 2022
Cores
16-core
100%
L3 Cache
30 MB
100%
Base Frequency
2.4 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.1 GHz
100%
Max. DDR5 RAM Speed
4800 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M Jan 7th, 2010 | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-12900F Jan 4th, 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Released | Jan 4th, 2022 |
| – | MSRP | $494.00 |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| LGAG1 | Socket | LGA1700 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 65 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | 3200 MHz (DDR4), 4800 MHz (DDR5) |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated GPU | No Integrated Graphics |
| Not Overclockable | Overclock Support | Overclockable |
