Core i3-350M vs Core i9-10850K in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The Core i3-350M is at least 2x slower gaming CPU than the Core i9-10850K. We cannot compare value as at least one CPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Core i3-350M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy – 35 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of the Core i9-10850K
- At least 2x faster CPU for gaming
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously – 20 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The CPU's performance with selected game settings
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Average FPS
178
85%
Min 1% FPS
123
86%
Price, $
Out of Stock
Value, $/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Average FPS
210
100%
Min 1% FPS
143
100%
Price, $
$255
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.21/FPS
100%
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-10850K in synthetic CPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Core i3-350M vs Core i9-10850K in core CPU performance specifications
Core i3-350M
Jan 7th, 2010
Cores
2-core
20%
L3 Cache
3 MB
15%
Base Frequency
2.267 GHz
63%
Turbo Frequency
GHz
Max. DDR3 RAM Speed
MHz
Core i9-10850K
Jul 27th, 2020
Cores
10-core
100%
L3 Cache
20 MB
100%
Base Frequency
3.6 GHz
100%
Turbo Frequency
5.2 GHz
100%
Max. DDR4 RAM Speed
2933 MHz
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
Core i3-350M | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | Core i9-10850K |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 7th, 2010 | Release Date | Jul 27th, 2020 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
35 W | Power Consumption | 125 W |
| Other Features | ||
| DDR3 | RAM | DDR4 @ 2933 MHz |
| On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
